Skip to main content

Evaluation Publications

Evaluation Publications

GambleAware’s evaluation process is how we build the evidence for what really works to minimise gambling harm. Our methodology is based on industry best practice, governed by a standard protocol applied to everything we commission.

Findings from our commissioned evaluation projects can be filtered by theme using the drop down menu below

Residential Rehabilitation Services for Gambling Disorder with Complex and Co-morbid Presentation: Evaluation Report
Tavistock Institute and IFF Research

This report provides a comprehensive evaluation of the pilot implementation of the Residential Rehabilitation Service for Gambling Disorder with Complex and Co-morbid Presentation. The service, commissioned by GambleAware, aims to enhance access to gambling harm treatment for individuals with co-morbidities, while also providing a holistic, joined-up pathway for gambling harm, substance misuse and mental health treatment.

Stigma Programme Best Practice Scoping Review
NatCen

This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of best practice methods when tackling stigma in gambling and adjacent sectors. The review summarised and synthesised evidence from 44 individual papers which covered best practice for designing, setting up, delivering and evaluating anti-stigma campaigns and wider programmes in sectors including gambling, mental health, HIV and dementia.

World Cup Bet Regret campaign evaluation
GambleAware (Dan Riley; Research lead for advertising and brand)

This short paper summarises the execution and evaluation of the World Cup Bet Regret campaign launched by GambleAware on the 14 November 2022.

Women's prevention campaign evaluation
GambleAware (Dan Riley; Research Lead for advertising and brand)

This short paper summarises the execution and evaluation of the second burst of the women’s prevention campaign launched by GambleAware on the 15 September 2022.

Evaluation of the Gambling Support Service Scotland
Kantar Public

GambleAware commissioned Kantar Public to conduct a process and impact evaluation to capture learnings
from the two-year pilot of GSS Scotland. Primary qualitative methods and secondary project data analyses were used to capture the experiences and views of those involved in the project and assess the project’s impact. This is the final evaluation report.